Excerpts From:

Sanctions on DC

For Use of Illegitimate Power

 

(You Read It Right.  Okay, okay.  "Weaponless sanctions by the people" is technically a boycott...  But, it's catchy, right?)

 

Transmittal To Congress

 

Whenever [an authority] exercises a national emergency, [they] must immediately transmit to the Congress a report with the following details (50 USC §§ 1601 et seq., 1621 et seq., 1631 et seq., 1701(a) et seq.):

 

Section 1

 

(1) the circumstances in which necessitates such exercise of authority is the Constitution being put in jeopardy by failure on the part of all three branches of the federal government to recognize constitutional order, whereas:

(a) the federal government’s actions, laws, and measures have shown to conflict with or erode provisions in Articles I, § 2, Par. 3, § 8, Last Par.; II, § 1, Last Par.; III, § 2, Par. 1 & 2; V; VI, Last Par.; Amendments I; II; III; IV; V; VI; X; XIII; XIV (i.e., ATDP, NDRPA, FISA, US PATRIOT ACT, NSSE, GRABIF, NDAA, PIPA, SOPA, TARP, AHCA; e.g., ECPA, TPP; etc.),

(b) the federal government polarized and refused the protests and petitions of the people (e.g., Tea Party, Occupy, Main Street Suffrage, etc.), calling for the restoration of the Bill of Rights and liberties, which is in the people’s First Amendment purview to assemble and require redress (Article “Ά” I, Section “§” 8, Last Par. “¶”),

(c) the federal government failed to recognize the weight and authority of the Continental Congress of 2012, which exists to supercede all representation by the authority to restore order of the Constitution to prevent misconstruction or abuse of powers, as in the introduction to the adoption of the U.S. Constitution by the First Congress, and to remove the cause of jeopardy to the Constitution, for economic, social, and civil rights under attack (Ά II § 1, Last ¶; Ά VI, Last ¶; Bill of Rights; Amendments XIII, XIV § 1),

(d) the courts acted at odds with rules of the court, contrary to federal law, and against the Constitution in the course of their decisions rejecting the pleas, petitions, writs, and sovereignty of the people necessary for a democracy, while simultaneously rolling back anti-trust protection (as in, Citizens United), Voting Rights Act, and middle-class wealth (as asserted in, People v. United States “Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus of the People for Grievances”; Rush, et al v. U.S. “Complaint to Obtain Indictment”, “Order to Enforce Will of the People”; and, etc.) (Amend. XIV § 4),

(e) governmental bodies rejected the accountability authority of the people to hold fair federal elections and the consent powers of the people to declare the federal government of the United States to be unauthorized and illegitimate, in the lawful process to hold accountable public servants for conspiring to erode the Bill of Rights and general malfeasance (18 USC § 371; USC A(5)),

(f) members of the federal government provided false information in an attempt to obstruct the people-led federal recall, and acted to obstruct notices to be published by the Federal Registrar under general applicability for a governmental body, although legally established having exercised its enforcement by issuing a penalty, which has the proper authority of the Constitution in these matters under the Tenth Amendment (18 USC Part I, Ch 73 § 1505; 44 USC § 1505(a)(2)),

(g) the federal government held illegal elections (Ά I § 2, ¶ 3; Amend. XIV § 3) following its contempt of the federal recall and warrants for removal, which, the recall was legally filed according to George Washington’s process (Letter to Bushrod Washington, 1787) and did not include states’ participation, given that state representation and process, including the electoral college, were struck down by the courts as a conflict of interest in these matters and contrasted by consent powers of the people for accountability, which is reserved to their purview, rendering Amendment XII not applicable under such circumstance (18 USC § 402; 28 USC § 4.1(b); “Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office”, Congressional Research Service, 2012; Declaration of Independence; Tenth Amendment),

(h) the federal government recently supplied militaristic handguns to local police in Fergusson, Missouri and used drone strikes against American citizens in Yemen in 2011 without due process (and habeas corpus), contrary to the Bill of Rights and human rights.  For, executive proclamations, such as 7463, are made null and void upon their inception for exceeding constitutional limits for such emergency measures that were made without ensuring protection for the Constitution and laws such as Sections 123(a) and 12006 of Title 10 of the United States Code, were not granted emergency ratification process by Congress, as permitted in Article V.  Rather, these abuse of powers were rightfully protested, and portions recently found improper, as exceeding delegated powers for unto illegitimate use (Bill of Rights),

(i) these claims have not been successfully repudiated or acknowledged, so favorable judgment was rendered to the people by Will of the People C.A.B. (50 USC 201 et seq., 18 U.S.C § 371);

 

Section 2

 

(2) such circumstances constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and, whether in whole or substantial part, exists outside of the proper United States at its source, because:

(a) this set of circumstance is highly unusual where the people are in the position of enforcing law.  For, the federal government cannot both claim to have proper authority of the U.S. Constitution and act as its enemy for removal of protections of the people, else, any laws made to protect the people by removal of liberties must be for a specific and limited purpose for a temporary and set point of time or it becomes a burden to the point of being egregious.  If the federal government does not wish to comply with the First Amendment right of the people to receive redress and to be held accountable by sovereign will of the people according to their Tenth Amendment powers described by George Washington and in the Declaration of Independence for federal recall and governed consent authority, when all traditional means of representation have failed, then the people must employ additional legal means, no matter how unusual.  In this instance, pressure must somehow be brought without violence, and that means sanctions against the occupying force standing in opposition to the United States, which, in this case, is the illegitimate federal government acting against the Constitution for the economic detriment of the people at the expense of all liberty, existing both as the foreign power and enemy (Bill of Rights; Determination Proclamation executed on January 20, 2015; Proclamation: Establishment of Constitutional Order February 27, 2015; Executive Order: Execution of Constitutional Order, February 27, 2015),

(b) this subversion against the Constitution for the economic oppression of the people and overthrow of their rights cannot be permitted to continue, as it leaves the people no choice but to riot against their government in order to secure their rights.  Wherein, the use of force would be catastrophic to the legal standing of the people: who are in their constitutional right to defend the Constitution, but which could also be misconstrued as seditious.  For, the people assert the federal government is guilty of inciting violence in this manner (28 U.S.C. § 631(i); 18 U.S.C. § 2101).  For, insurrection against the Constitution is treason against the existence of the state and must be defended (Ά III § 3, ¶ 1).  For, the people have made every concerted effort within their power to have the government comply with and conform to the order of the Constitution, and have exhausted protest, petition, election, notice and legal recourse having rendered contempt and ordered warrants, by a proper legal agency against recallees and contemnors, which were obstructed.  Without sanctions by the constitutionally authorized [authority], voted in by legal federal recall and sworn in to protect the people in defense of their constitutional rights and authority, our system of democracy would otherwise fail at the hands of corrupt overlords.  Therefore, the legal course of sanctions by this constitutionally authorized [authority], elected according to extraordinary powers of the people, must preempt any violence in order to preserve the union of the United States and economy of the middle-class actively being destroyed by protested means (50 USC 201 et seq.; Tenth Amendment),

(c) District of Columbia is a city-state acting as a federal district under the law and jurisdiction of the federal government, wholly separate of any state or local government.  It is complicit to the crimes of the federal government against this Constitution by reason and application of law, and, thereby liable for sanctions subject to the will of the people under the Constitution.  DC, along with its government, is thereby an enemy of the U.S. as a foreign state in the eyes of the Constitution and a threat to the foreign policy of the authorized United States (50 USC 201 et seq.);

 

Section 3

 

(3) the authorities to be exercised will be as is customary to hold sanctions, consistent with National Emergencies Act and 50 USC 1601 et seq. and/or 1701 et seq., to block, quarantine, order compliance, work with foreign allies, convene joint Congress, restore order, and the actions to be taken in the exercise of those authorities to deal with such unusual and emergency circumstances as needed will be rations, shutdowns, closures, blockades, evacuations, boycotts, arrests, unarmed military action, the call for foreign assistance, receive terms of surrender, address the nation, and reaffirm the Constitution, with the following caveats and constraints

(3 USC Ch 4 § 301 et seq.; 15 USC Ch 1 § 6; 10 USC §§ 123, 527, 2201(c); 14 USC §§ 331, 359, 367; Tenth Amendment):

(a) powers of the constitutionally authorized [authority] is inclusive of all functions in these matters, however, persons and entities complying with these sanctions are not authorized to act contrary to order of the Constitution, neither against the authorized government nor by it (3 USC Ch 4 § 301 et seq.),

(b) immunity, as in 22 USC § 254a et seq., does not apply to members of the federal government, or corporations and organizations working for the government, acting to the detriment of the people or against the U.S. Constitution and its authorized government, as it constitutes malfeasance, conspiracy, and treason (USC A(5); 18 USC § 371; Ά III § 3, ¶ 1),

(c) only the constitutionally authorized [authority] can declare whether further action is justified and to what extent further action is required when acting on behalf of the people, so that civil unrest may yet be avoidable,

(d) to the extent that the provisions of this Executive Order are inconsistent with federal law or inconvenient, the provisions of this Executive Order shall supersede any such provisions, wherever such provisions may be found, and, regardless of any law requiring such subsection to be specifically identified, as it pertains to the duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States under such threat, as there is no other reasonable course available to the people under such absolute and devastating threat (Tenth Amendment),

(e) regarding security, as in Title 6 of U.S. Code, it is appropriate that future oral or written agreements of the United States Authorized Government should not be transmitted to Congress, nor committees on foreign relations and international relations in the several houses of Congress, as the unauthorized and illegitimate government and its members are enemies of the state and such is contrary to national security, in the opinion of this constitutionally authorized [authority], by order of the Constitution (1 USC Ch 2 § 112b(a), Tenth Amendment),

(f) any transmittal and reporting to Congress (including without limit, 50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 1621 et seq., 1701 et seq., etc.) shall be in accordance with the people’s timetable and schedule and shall not automatically terminate until the authorized [authority] of the United States, subject to the Constitution and elected by federal recall, comes before a joint session of Congress to restore order (Specific Federal Recall Election Procedures),

(g) Commencement of the term of office for [authority] did not result in being sworn into office according to law (§101) due to obstructions and legal process, but the United States is still liable for pay retroactively to the applicable date of January 20 following the legal federal recall election of 2014 for executive services rendered in the position of Defender of the Constitution, as authorized acting [authority], upon the immediate surrender by the unauthorized federal government for relinquishment of its illegitimate powers to the authorized [authority], for authorized powers, which must precede restoration of all things according to Specific Federal Recall Election Procedures and constitutional order (3 USC Ch 2 § 101 et seq.),

(h) sanction, or suspension of commercial intercourse with a state in insurrection, including confiscation of property, applies to the unauthorized and illegitimate federal government and its city-state DC, but cannot be used against the government of the authorized [authority], or [its] administration, entities, officers, personnel, or families, for such action would constitute an escalation unto premeditated war against the authority and order of the Constitution, requiring a full, retaliatory response by unarmed militia without need of further declaration or executive decision (50 USC Ch 13 § 205 et seq.; 50 USC Ch 35 § 1701 et seq.; 50 USC Ch 39 § 7701),

(i) the constitutionally authorized [authority] may use restraint and forfeiture of trade in transit pursuant to conspiracy (15 USC Ch 1 § 6), but DC and the unauthorized government cannot retaliate against the authorized government of the United States or discriminate against Americans for these sanctions under 15 USC Ch 2 VI § 75 et seq., and does not qualify for foreign or war assistance except to avoid tragedy, like 22 USC Ch 79 § 7205 (State Sponsors of International Terrorism) and 22 USC Ch 79 § 7207 (Prohibition on Assistance and Finance of Terrorism),

(j) under sanction, it is unlawful to trade with the enemy of the United States Authorized Government, which is the unauthorized and illegitimate federal government and its city-state, DC (50 Appendix (Trading With The Enemy Act of 1917) Ch 106, 40 Stat. 411 § 1 et seq.).

(k) the constitutionally authorized [authority] may utilize evacuation plans as deemed fitting, as this national emergency constitutes a man-made disaster (6 USC Ch 1, Sub§ V, § 321a (a)(1); Sub§ XIII, § 572 (a)(1)),

(l) the distinction, format, order and placement of legal references used herein does not negate their applicability or effect, but are in the words and language of the people (Tenth Amendment);

 

Section 4

 

(4) the (authorized) [authority] believes such actions are necessary to deal with those circumstances, as follows:

(a) these economic sanctions, backed by the enforcement by boycott and forced evacuation, to block the sale and service of breads to certain times and ration the sale and service of water, are absolutely imperative to avert civil unrest for the protection of the people against the economic enslavement and overthrow of the Constitution by corrupt means.  A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER exists as long as federal government unreasonably and irrationally poses as legitimate authority, whereby there now exists two [authorities].  The illegitimate federal government must be stopped here or civil unrest will be inevitable, as a house divided cannot stand (Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address).  The Constitution has suffered violence, whereby laws have been enacted without oversight or accountability to the people to the detriment of the middle-class and small business economies and the health of the people under a sketchy and burdened link to the Constitution.  Whereas, illegal federal elections are enforced, liberties have been made illusory, and the Constitution itself has lost its strongest ties to democracy with the erosion of due process and right to receive redress (First Amendment),

(b) this Executive Order is necessary to protect and restore the absolute right and sovereign will of the people under the Constitution for accountability of the government by consent of the governed, and for any other powers of the people that may exist in precedence, founding documents, or higher law (Declaration of Independence, First and Tenth Amendments).  For, members of the federal government are neither authorized of the U.S. Constitution to act against its laws for its erosion or its citizens for their detriment, nor authorized to represent the United States to foreign nations as in an official or legal capacity outside of proper constitutional standing, which represents a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to the existence of the United States and the protections of the people found in the Bill of Rights and higher law (18 USC § 371; USC A(5)).

 

Citations and Recitals

 

By the authority… of the Constitution and proper and applicable laws of the United States of America, in accordance with the reasonings and justifications in the Transmittal To Congress, the Determination Proclamation by Will of the People on January 20, 2015, and the Proclamation: Establishment of Constitutional Order, and the Executive Order: Execution of Constitutional Order, both made law February 27, 2015, including, and to the extent acts were undertaken foreign to, or the erosion or erasure of, the United States under the Constitution and its authorized powers and proper laws, the following laws are applicable: the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), conspiracy for economic benefit (18 U.S.C § 371); general malfeasance (U.S.C. A(5)); obstruction of an agency (18 U.S.C. Part I, Ch 73 § 1505), display of force and encouraging incitement and unrest (as in, supplying militaristic weaponry to local police, etc.) (28 U.S.C. § 631(i); 18 U.S.C. § 2101; Ch. 115 USC §§ 2381 - 2385, Title 18), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

 

[It is found] that the use of federal powers in the United States has exceeded constitutional limits and authority, including the Government's erosion of constitutional guarantees of the people without constitutional process or proper applicable law, conspiring for economic oppression and benefit for a select group to the specific detriment of lesser fortunate, arbitrary arrest and detention of Occupy protestors, unaccountability to consent of the governed and will of the people mandated by Continental Congress, restricting political dissenters from press, curtailment of voting rights and lawful fair people-led federal recall elections (as established by George Washington), obstruction of a lawful and proper governmental agency, show of force in response to police protests for human rights violations and abuses, and as well as the exacerbating presence of significant public corruption and illegal use of power, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and Constitution of the United States, so I hereby take receipt of all federal power, redelegated to me by the people to redress grievances for equitable acts, and so declare a national emergency to deal with the stated threat.  Accordingly, [it is ordered]:

 

The bread and water supply in DC shall be blocked and rationed; whereby stores and vendors shall sell or serve bread by 1 serving or package and at uncertain times to change daily, and water shall be sold, served or distributed by 1/4 cup measure per portion as ration.  Penalty for violation of this Executive Order shall be $250,000 for civil acts, $1,000,000 or 20 years jail time for criminal acts (50 U.S.C. 1705 et seq.), and all fines, fees, penalties and bailment shall be payable to the great court and counsel of the people Will of the People Constitutional Authority Board, after filing fee(s) to the court wherein served, not to exceed presently stated amounts (Tenth Amendment reserved federal powers of the people).

 

Definitions

 

(1) The term “DC” applies to the District of Columbia, a.k.a. “Washington, DC”;

(2) The terms “the state” and “United States” as they are used in this document, in of themselves, neither includes the District of Columbia nor the property of the unauthorized and illegitimate federal government as they are found in 2 USC Ch 29 and 3 USC Ch 1 § 21 et seq., but is contested territory as 4 USC Ch 3 § 71 is understood, as so is the flag, seal, and seat of government under Title 4;

(3) The terms “authorized” and “proper” is legal authority subject to the Constitution, inclusive of accountability by consent of the governed (Declaration of Independence, First and Tenth Amendments).  However, authority that is not authorized (“unauthorized”, “unlawful”) does not stem from the U.S. Constitution, and authority that is not proper (“illegitimate”) does not protect the U.S. Constitution, by their respective definitions as they are understood.  Unauthorized and illegitimate government is no longer delegated authority by the U.S. Constitution because they are at odds, by reason of conflicting interests (Tenth Amendment).  Such government is subject to intervention by way of Tenth Amendment reserved federal powers of the people, which is in the sole purview of the people when powers are redelegated, as the courts have deemed it a conflict of interest for states to contest federal power (“Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office”, Congressional Research Service, 2012).

Top   Home

 

We The People.

It is Our Heritage, Our Right, Our Fight  ~  For Freedom.

Because YOUR Civil Liberties Matter!